Women Will Die Because of This


To some degree, the Trump administration’s daily assault on women is not a surprise. Republicans have a notoriously terrible record on women’s rights, or as some radicals like to call them, human rights. Their “family values” — opposition to abortion rights, paid family leave, the equal pay act, comprehensive sex education, Planned Parenthood, universal coverage of birth control disproportionately hurt women — women of color, immigrant women, LGBT women, disabled women especially.

And it’s not like Trump didn’t tell us who he was — over and over and over again. In his campaign announcement when he called Mexican immigrants drug dealers and rapists, in the Access Hollywood tape when he described how he grabbed women “by the pussy” and claimed they’ll let you do anything when you’re famous. When he called Venezuelan Miss Universe contestant, Alicia Machado, “Miss Housekeeping” and “Miss Piggy.” When twelve women came forward accusing him of sexual harassment, misconduct, and assault.

But at times, it can be particularly awful. A 20-week abortion ban, the ridiculously named and scientifically absurd Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, passed the House of Representatives. In addition, the Trump Administration implemented a policy that allows any employer to refuse to cover birth control for “religious or moral” reasons, which, as Erin Gloria Ryan points out in the Daily Beast, means that your boss’s discomfort with women who have sex can be a good enough reason. And the Department of Health and Human Services has issued a strategic plan which defines life as beginning at conception, and the implications for women’s health are nothing short of catastrophic (you can tell them what you think of this idea here).

And as allegations against Harvey Weinstein multiplied and gained traction, women across the internet have chimed in with their own stories or silently scrolled passed others keeping their own locked up in that knot in their stomachs. And the women who accused Trump wonder why no one believed them, why their abuser is now allowed to decide their access to birth control, to healthcare, to abortions. We all live with the daily insult of a sexual abuser in the White House, but for these women, that trauma is tenfold. And we all live with the knowledge that many of those in power care more about the political affiliations of the abuser than about those who have been abused.

Finally, in a memo exclusively obtained by Crooked Media, the Trump administration outlines an even more dramatic battle plan in their war on women. From calling for sex education that only promotes the rhythm method (which fails in 25% of cases) to abstinence only education, to eliminating the Let Girls Learn initiative and programs fighting and studying teen pregnancy, the memo is a strident battle cry against women’s agency and established science.

Undergirding all of this is the knowledge that these practices hurt some women disproportionately more than others — women whom people in power are much less likely to believe because of their race, gender identity, sexual orientation, profession, disability, or immigration status.

Women like Jane Doe, in what is perhaps the most horrifying and dystopian of the many current cases against women. Jane Doe was caught crossing the border as an undocumented, unaccompanied minor. She was transferred to an immigration “shelter” where she discovered that she was pregnant and requested access to an abortion. Abortions are notoriously difficult in Texas where minors cannot seek an abortion without parental permission, but because of new rules put in place by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (which oversees unaccompanied, undocumented minors) wherein each case must be decided personally by the Office’s director, Jane Doe’s case is exponentially and unnecessarily more difficult. It thus became an object for the courts.

The first judge who oversaw the case, United States District Judge Tanya Chutkan, ordered that the federal government to allow Jane Doe the procedure, but the Trump administration appealed, and an appeals court granted the government until October 31 to transfer custody of Jane Doe from the shelter to a sponsor who can help her get access to the abortion. While Jane waits for a sponsor, she also gets ever closer to the 20-week abortion ban, already the law of the land in Texas.

While Jane Doe’s case is the most prominent, it is certainly not the only of its kind. In a Vox rundown of the issue, they highlight another even more horrifying case in which a young woman was granted access to an abortion by medication. After she had taken the first dose, however, officials from the Office of Refugee Resettlement forced her to go to the emergency room to see if the abortion could be reversed. She was ultimately allowed to take the second dose to finalize the procedure, but the administration’s desire not only to prevent but also reverse bodily autonomy for women is at its darkest in situations like these.

While the Trump administration seeks to limit women’s access to abortions across the board, and while states have been slowly stripping this right of its efficacy since Roe v. Wade was first decided, their appalling, brazen denial of this young woman’s right to an abortion cannot be divorced from the racial animus of their immigration policy. The Trump administration is full of xenophobes, cowards and racists who see men and women with darker skin as less deserving of Constitutional protection.

But it is not just black and brown women who face the violence and indignity of the Trump administration’s misogyny. As Ryan points out in another Daily Beast article (what, she does good reporting!) the memo obtained by Crooked Media is rife not only with misogyny, but Islamophobia as well. And the two are inextricably linked.

“The spectre of sexual abuse by Muslim men has long been used by those pushing an Islamophobic agenda to drum up fear of immigration. The administration’s sudden concern for women would feel less disingenuous if the Trump administration cared about sexual assaults committed by anybody who wasn’t brown (perhaps by somebody who was more, uh, orange, for starters), but as it stands, this concern trolling is very of-the-Breitbart-playbook.”

This recalls the same tactics as they were (and are) deployed against black men, when the ideal of the purity of white women perpetuated racist, violent imagery. It recalls Donald Trump’s campaign announcement when he called Mexican immigrants “rapists,” and it reminds that the moments most dangerous for Trump’s campaign were not this overtly racist imagery or his mockery of norms and institutions, but the accusations of assault by white women.

All at once, Trump attacks women’s autonomy, our rights, and our health, while using perceived fragility or sacredness (thanks for that one General Kelly) to enforce a racist, fear based campaign against anyone with darker skin than a peach crayon.

White women have been notoriously bad allies — whether in the suffragette movement or the recent Twitter boycott, we have a bad habit of making it all about us. We can make sure not to do that this time. The Trump administration is attacking women — attacking us at every level, from our bodies to our relationship with our employers and we have to work against that. But we also have to remember that we cannot, we cannot let them use us to further their xenophobic, racist war. We have to remember the women in detention centers, women in prison, women who can’t take time off work to drive to Planned Parenthood, to cross state lines, to get new jobs with employers who will cover their contraception. While we fight for our right to work instead of staying home, we have to remember the women working three jobs because they can’t afford to make that choice.

If feminism is the radical notion that women are people, than the Trump Administration is about as far from that as they can be. They aren’t content with restricting our healthcare, our education, or our resources the way previous Republican administrations have. No, they are actively seeking out men to whom they can give control over our bodies. Whether it’s our access to abortions, our access to Planned Parenthood, or our access to contraceptives, it is clear that the Trump Administration sees women as objects — objects for sex, objects for pregnancy, objects for holding, objects for grabbing.

Does this seem overzealous to you? Does it feel like I’ve taken it too far?

At every step, this administration is a forced intrusion into our bodies. Women have long sought the ability to control our own destinies — to have kids or not, to stay work or not, to build homes or not. None of these choices are moral ones. None of them are any of your business. But as the Trump administration continues to funnel their money, time, energy, and considerable power into stripping women of their choices, into forcing them to carry pregnancies to term, and then abandoning them as soon as babies are born, into dismantling our schools and our communities, into turning us against each other — it shows us over and over again that it hates women. It seeks to control women.

They hate us. And they have thousands of years of culture and history to back them up. But we have ourselves, and we have each other, and we are going to fight back. We have to. Our lives are at stake.

Here’s How YOU Can #DefendDACA


Over the weekend, Politico reported that the Trump Administration planned to end DACA, or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. Undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States before they were 16 can apply for this program through which the federal government agrees not to deport the individual. Though this program does not provide legal status or permanent residency, it does allow undocumented Americans to do things like get driver’s licenses, work permits, and bank accounts. If you want to know more about why we need to protect this program, check out our Defend DACA post from last week.

Because this announcement is expected any day now, resistance organizations across the country are mobilizing quickly to protect this program and to advocate for the millions of undocumented immigrants currently living and working here, and especially the 800,000 young people who will be affected by this program. Here are some ways you can join the fight.

Find An Event Near You — there are events all over the country this week to stand up to the Trump Administration’s callous and cruel attitude toward this program and the many lives it affects. You can check out Defend DACA or Indivisible to find events near you. Show up and show your support for your fellow Americans — documents be damned.

Use Social Media — presumably you found this guide somewhere on a social media platform. Feel free to share this as far and as wide as possible. The Women’s March also tweeted out some really fantastic resources for Twitter in particular, including pre-written tweets that you can send to members of Congress and state Attorneys General to advocate for this program. Read this thread for more information or see the direct links to the list of pre-written tweets below. Feel free to use on Facebook or Instagram if those are your preferred social media platforms.

Tweets to urge these Attorneys General to take their names off Texas vs. US, a lawsuit being used to repeal #DACA.

Tweets to urge members of Congress to fight for this program

Call Your Members of Congress — as always, call your representative and your Senators. First ask them to vocally defend this program. They owe it to their constituents and to the undocumented Americans living in their states to show their support. Second, demand that they use their legislative power to make these protections permanent and provide a pathway to legal status. DACA is not a solution, but a stopgap put forth by President Obama in the face of a wildly obstructionist Congress that would not touch immigration reform. There are currently two laws in front of Congress that could do this — the DREAM Act in the Senate and the American Hope Act in the House. 5 Calls has a great script if you need it, but if you can make it your own, that’s always more effective. If you want help putting together a custom script, reach out to us at theneverthelessproject@gmail.com.

4. Learn More — follow organizations like Define American, UndocuMedia, Make the Road NY, Puente Arizona, and the Women’s March. Groups like these provide resources and do powerful grassroots organizing, but they also share stories. Every statistic you read about undocumented immigrants represents individual people, lives and communities and friends and families and children who have made their lives here, who already contribute their money, time, traditions, perspective, work, and love to this country. Learn their stories and listen to what they have to say.

Did I Mention You Should Call Your Members of Congress? — because you should call your members of Congress. 202–224–3121

Defend DACA


As I write this, I’m keeping one eye on my phone, waiting for breaking news alerts. In June 2017, ten states announced that they planned to sue the federal government on September 5 if Trump did not suspend the DACA program, otherwise known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. Word on the street is that Trump is leaning towards acquiescing. Surprise, surprise. This means that while I’m waiting anxiously to see if this blog post will suddenly become irrelevant, hundreds of thousands of young people across the country are waiting anxiously to see if their lives will be suddenly upended.

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was launched by the Obama administration in 2012 in response to Congressional gridlock on the DREAM Act as immigration reform. The purpose of the DREAM Act was to provide conditional residency and a pathway to permanent residency for young undocumented immigrants who had arrived in the country prior to age 16. While DACA does not provide that same conditional residency or pathway to permanent residency/citizenship, it did in the words of Dara Lind at Vox, provide “a commitment not to initiate deportation proceedings against the applicant.” Essentially, young people who registered under the program could get work permits, would be allowed to register for bank accounts and credit cards, could get access to health insurance, without the constant threat of deportation.

It certainly wasn’t ideal, but DACA is an important stopgap which helps protect hundreds of thousands of young people across the country while the rest of us try to work out how to see and treat them as human beings.

Arguments for immigration reform are well meaning and practical and Define American has a great fact sheet that lays some of them out. Their sources include the Social Security Administration, the Pew Research Center, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, and other reputable sources. I urge you to check out their resources, especially if you have friends or relatives who are most likely to be convinced by an economic argument.

According to these sources, undocumented Americans pay $11.64 billion annually in state and local taxes, which amounts to an effective 8% tax rate. For comparison’s sake, America’s richest 1% pay an effective 5.4% tax rate. Undocumented Americans have also paid $12 billion annually to the Social Security Trust Fund, and an estimated $100 billion in the last decade. Overall, immigrants are an important facet of economic growth — immigrants are more likely to start businesses and less likely to commit crimes. Allowing hard working people who have made lives here to come out of hiding and contribute in economically meaningful ways will, according to most research, benefit the rest of us.

And that’s great, and if you have people you want to convince who will only listen to these arguments, use them. But there is a more pressing issue here, which is that approximately 11 million people live in this country and do not have access to legal status and the accompanying benefits. They are already contributing their taxes and their work, their friendships and their traditions and their faith to the fabric of this country but we aren’t giving them much back besides fear.

Of course there are people in every group who aren’t conscientious, who aren’t hard working, who take without giving back, who wreak havoc or cause violence. I can think of a lot of white American citizens who fit that bill — we saw them exercising that violence all over Charlottesville. We see white American citizens who run rampant over our finances, who use nepotism to get jobs they are unqualified for, who commit crimes and yet somehow we still manage to treat them like human beings, and their punishment is rarely being forced to leave their homes to live in a country they’ve long since left behind.

We need comprehensive immigration reform, reform that adheres to the values we profess — family, diversity, compassion. We need it so that the law treats immigrants, documented and undocumented alike, the same as the rest of us. Regardless of where you were born, you are a human being and deserving of the dignity the law grants to so many of us because of the privileges of our birth (frankly, this applies to many more Americans besides immigrants, but that’s another blog post).

Call your members of Congress and ask them to support the DREAM Act. A new version of the law was introduced last month. But also ask them, and your attorney general, to defend DACA. 5 calls still has this as an option if you’re looking for a script, and Defend DACA is a great website with resources and scripts and a ton of helpful information. If Congress can’t manage to get its shit together, the least the Trump administration can do is not dismantle the current protections as a punishment on young people for our inability to come up with a plan for immigration reform.

There are lives on the line and there’s something you can do to help. Call today.

RAISE what exactly?

“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”


If you’ve managed to miss the back-and-forth between Stephen Miller and Jim Acosta, congratulations! Do you have room under your rock for me? I’ll bring my own TV (just Netflix, promise). The RAISE (Reforming American Immigration for a Strong Economy) Act which is co-sponsored by Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) and David Perdue (R-Georgia) was introduced to the Senate in February of 2017. Last week, the Trump Administration announced its support of the bill, once again bringing immigration reform and the Trump rhetoric around outsiders to the national spotlight.

What exactly would the RAISE Act do?

The RAISE Act seeks to “[…]establish a skills-based immigration points system, to focus family sponsored immigration on spouses and minor children, to eliminate the Diversity Visa Program, to set a limit on the number of refugees admitted annually to the United States, and for other purposes.” (source)

It would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to:

  • Eliminate the diversity immigrant visa category. The Diversity Visa Program offers a preference for individuals from underrepresented countries via a lottery. Removing this element of Immigration Policy would lead to a more homogeneous immigrant class (that might be a theme here).
  • Tweak the processes for determining who qualifies for an employer-sponsored green card. There is no increase to the number of these types of green cards, currently capped at 140,000. Currently there are five ways folks can qualify for employer-sponsored immigration: “persons of extraordinary ability”; professionals with advanced graduate degrees or exceptional ability; professionals, skilled workers and unskilled workers (capped at 5,000); certain special immigrants who meet U.S. national interests; and those who invest at least $500,000. The RAISE Act would change this to be a point-based system placing an added focus on English-language proficiency (for the first time) and salary.
  • Set the fiscal year limit for refugee admissions to 50,000. This would remove the President’s ability to adjust the amount as needed for diplomatic or humanitarian goals.
  • Limit uncapped family-sponsored immigration to spouses and minor (under 18) children. Family-sponsored immigration accounts for 2/3 of immigration currently. Currently, US citizens can sponsor spouses, minor (under 21) children, and parents without any limit. US citizens can also sponsor adult children and siblings; however, these categories are subject to caps. Legal permanent residents can sponsor spouses, minor children, and adult unmarried children. In addition, RAISE would lower the capped categories from 226,000 green cards offered to 88,000. (source)

Instead of fixing our immigration system, or professionalizing/focusing on high-skilled labor, this dramatically cuts the number of people who would be allowed into the US, and makes it incredibly difficult to earn one of those coveted spots. Don’t believe me? See if you would qualify for immigration under the RAISE act.

While on the surface, this conversation is all about who we let in and why; there’s a deeper question, which Acosta articulated somewhat in his exchange. The RAISE Act brings to question our values as a country. We can agree that there has to be a limit to immigration. However, does that limit come at the cost of our commitment to keeping families together, does it come at the cost of saving lives, does it come at the cost of offering true opportunity to those who dare seek it? This is a conversation central to the core of our American values. We have to continue to educate ourselves on it, and come up with creative and compassionate solutions.