Al Franken, #MeToo, and Internalized Misogyny

…Or How I Accidentally Started My Biggest Twitter Fight To Date


I have this strange impulse to say that it’s a shitty time to be a woman, as if it hasn’t been shitty for a long time, as if our society isn’t founded at least in part on the subjugation of women, as if we haven’t been fighting for hundreds of years for our inherent humanity to be recognized. Still, I’m more afraid of my breaking news alerts these days than I have been at any other point during the Trump administration, let alone my time owning an iPhone.

It’s a good thing, that we’re having this conversation. And that we are exposing powerful men who have abused that power and the people around them, and that many of them are facing consequences for their actions. And while I empathize with and admire the women who can watch this onslaught with the vindictive joy of the victorious, I’m just not there yet. I’m tired. I don’t want the next alert to be about someone whose work means something to me, who has helped create me.

I know I am the product of a misogynist world, that the art and the stories and the lessons that have built me come from a world that also tears us down. Perhaps it isn’t a bad thing that this now confronts us almost daily, but it is also a painful thing, a hard thing. With every revelation is another thread to unwind, another piece of the knot where you wonder if it’s better to just cut the damn thing off rather than spend days and weeks untangling it. To be a woman is to never really be one hundred percent sure whether your complicated feelings are nuance or internalized misogyny. Like this:

Last week, someone yelled at me on Twitter for trivializing their sexual assault.

After Al Franken resigned, I came across this statement:

And from this blog’s twitter account, I responded:

It seemed a fairly uncontroversial statement in the moment, and I honestly didn’t think anything of it until I saw the first reply:

I don’t know this woman, and she doesn’t know me. And while I’m usually the one behind our blog twitter because I have a problem, it could have easily been one of four women, each with our own experiences, so it seems like quite an assumption she’s making. But I understand how you get there. Without knowing this woman’s story, I can only imagine how hard it was for her to come forward about the assault she experienced, what kind of backlash she faced, or questions she got. I don’t know if her attacker faced legal consequences, and I don’t know if it was a pattern or a single incident. I do know that she’s in therapy for PTSD because she told me.

Throughout the course of the conversation, her point was that going after what she called the “small” stuff allows more violent crimes to slip through. I think she’s wrong. I think that a culture which tells men that women’s bodies are up for grabs, that an unwanted hand on the ass or a forced kiss aren’t that big of a deal, is the culture that allows all kinds of violations, manipulative, violent, or otherwise. Men who grab at women without thinking about it, who don’t see through uncomfortable laughter and weak smiles to the paralyzing fear behind them, support a culture that says if you want it, you should take it. Confronting those incidents makes the point that women’s bodies are our own. We get to make the decisions about when and how we are touched. And that covers the more violent assaults too. The smaller the holes in the sieve, the less escapes our notice.

And I think that dismissing those “smaller” violations is to trivialize a different kind of violence, the kind that reminds us daily that society doesn’t see our bodies as our own. Every day can be an exercise in giving up pieces of ourselves — to the catcallers on the street, to the guy who gives you a once over in the elevator, to the fear that the person brushing up against you on the train is doing it on purpose, and what will you say if he is? Will you just stand there? The oppression that girds our society, the racism, sexism, ableism that are part of our foundations doesn’t go away when we take care of the big stuff. We ended slavery, we won the right to vote, we passed the Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. But only the very delusional or the very cruel will tell you that any of those -isms have disappeared.

Still, I get where she comes from. We have been taught to dismiss our own humanity, sure, but we’ve been taught to dismiss other women’s too. And when you’re hurting and traumatized and angry, it’s not that big of a jump to think “if only he had just grabbed my ass, then maybe I wouldn’t have to live with this.” It’s not a fair thought, nor a kind one. Comparisons are odious, but we have been taught to make them. I don’t know how my hurt or my exhaustion stacks up to hers, but I have been unkind too. I have fallen into the traps they have laid for us and I have struggled to climb back out. Some days I’m not sure I have.

We went back and forth for a little while, and then eventually I stopped. Twitter is not the place for this kind of discussion. 280 characters doesn’t allow for nuance and the pace of the responses doesn’t allow for thoughtful consideration. Plus our notifications were blowing up and it was a lot to keep up with. And while Mel C. kept responding to people for a while, she never really came back to our thread. Other people were angrier — they too were less kind.

I don’t have any answers for this. I think I handled it okay, but nothing about our conversation makes me less likely to post something similar in the future. I suppose it’s worth noting that we never really know what scars people have until they show us. We can read the macro things — to be a woman is hard, to be a woman of color, a disabled woman, an undocumented woman, a trans woman or a queer woman is harder still. But we can know these things cause traumas without knowing each other’s stories, the specific shape of each other’s hurt. We can listen, and be kind, except when we can’t. And then we just have to hope that the next woman can.

A Guide to Fighting about Sexual Misconduct

A word of warning: this can be an exhausting fight to have, especially if you’re a survivor of sexual violence. Take care of yourselves, friends. Head over to our self care guide if you need some suggestions.

Downloadable version coming soon!

What the hell is going on?

I’ve lost count of the number of prominent men who have had sexual assault and misconduct allegations come out in recent weeks. It’s been slowly simmering for the past year or so (and truthfully, even longer), but suddenly, we’ve hit a rolling boil and invariably, people are choosing to ignore all evidence to the contrary and believe abusers and assaulters. Following the accusations against Harvey Weinstein on October 5, the New York Times has been compiling a list of men with allegations against them and the fallout from each. It’s extensive, and yet specifically doesn’t include men for whom there has been little or no fallout.

So how are we defining assault?

Truthfully, we tend to use “sexual assault” to include a lot of things it doesn’t necessarily include in a legal sense. If you’re going to be diving into this around the dinner table, it’s important to be precise. Sexual misconduct is the umbrella term that encompasses a whole host of shitbaggery:

  • Sexual assault, which typically involves unwanted physical contact or coercion, manipulation, or force to make someone engage in unwanted physical contact
  • Sexual harassment, a form of discrimination against a person, that is believed by the victim to carry consequences if they don’t submit to the behavior
  • Sexual exploitation, which involves nonconsensual, unjust, or abusive sexual advantage, including recording or photographing a person without their knowledge, voyeurism, trafficking, and more
  • Sexual intimidation, including threatening sexual violence against a person, engaging in indecent exposure, and more

If you’re looking for more details on types of sexual violence, RAINN is a fantastic resource. Sexual misconduct runs the gamut, but most importantly, it is never, never the victim’s fault, no matter what they’re wearing, how much they had to drink, or whatever reason people have settled on to brush away serious crimes.


Why should we care?

An American is sexually assaulted every 98 seconds. Victims face backlash and criticism on many fronts, leading many to not report their assaults. And as if that wasn’t bad enough, in September, the Department of Education rolled back Obama era guidelines on how school campuses should handle accusations of sexual misconduct, raising the level of evidence needed for campus justice systems to hold students responsible.

As accusations continue to come out, one thing is continually made clear. This isn’t a political issue. Abusers are everywhere across the political spectrum, because sexual misconduct and violence is about one thing: power.

We care about this because sexual violence shouldn’t be about the sexual part, but about the violence.

We care because assaulters are given the benefit of the doubt while victims are told they’re making it up or are taking back their consent after the fact or should just take a compliment.

We care because Brock Turner is back living his life, because there are 16 women who have accused the president of sexual assault, because #MeToo started 10 years ago and is still going strong.


What’s my conservative relative going to say?

Glad you asked! Here’s a list of some likely comments and response suggestions.

Them: “I’m so sad about [insert public figure here]. I love their movies/tv shows/music/politics.”
You: “I understand. It’s hard when someone we admire turns out to not be as great as we thought. Their work is still great, but it’s hard for me to support them now that other people have come forward about their experiences.”
Them: “But do we really know?”
You: “I choose to believe victims. The rate of false accusations is somewhere between 2% and 10%, which means that the rate of real accusations is 90%-98%.”

Them: “His life is ruined now.”
You: “Yes. It’s unfortunate that so many people have had similar experiences with him. He used his position of power to influence people in a terrible way, and now he’s having to live with the consequences for his actions.”

Them: “You’re innocent until proven guilty in this country, and none of them have been found guilty.”
You: “Our courts do operate on the presumption of innocence, which is definitely a good thing. But that just applies to the government. The public isn’t under obligation to believe someone is innocent until the courts have found them guilty.”

Them: “Even if it happened, it was years ago. Why come forward now??”
You: “Often, it takes victims a lot of time to come to terms with what they experienced. They may not want to talk about it at the time because they’re young or feel unsafe doing so or fear they won’t be believed. There may be no legal recourse for someone who was abused many years ago, but they may feel like they need to speak about their experiences to keep it from happening to other people. The tides suddenly felt like they were turning after the Harvey Weinstein allegations and many victims finally felt safer coming forward about their own experiences.”

Them: “But Bill Clinton!”
You: “Yep. We probably fucked that one up, but we’re learning and getting better. Sexual misconduct definitely isn’t limited to just one political party.”

Them: “Men are assaulted too!
OR
Them: “Women assault people too!”
You: “You’re right. Our current statistics are more accurate for victims who are women because men are even less likely to report sexual violence. Society places a heavy stigma on victims who are men, and we should be more supportive of all victims.

Them: “Oh please, that’s not assault! That’s just a compliment!”
You: “Please never compliment me that way. It may not be assault, but it’s definitely misconduct.”

Them: “It’s all a liberal media conspiracy to keep Roy Moore from office.”
You: “It’s not. There’s a strong pattern of behavior. He was banned from a shopping mall in the 80’s. A former Alabama deputy state attorney said it was common knowledge that he dated high school girls. As of November 16, eight women have publicly shared their experiences about Roy Moore.”
Them: “Whatever. It’s better to elect a pedophile than a Democrat.”
You: Just take your plate and leave the table. It’s not worth it at this point.

“It’s taken too long for some women to find their voices”


I’ve been angry a lot this week. Really, I’ve been angry since election day, but this week has been a particularly angry one.

I’m angry that white supremacists held a city hostage this week and three people died. And quite honestly, I’m not sure what to do with all this anger.

I’m angry that white supremacists held a city hostage this week and three people died. It’s a similar anger I felt after the shooting at Mother Emanuel in Charleston. Charleston has been a second home to me. I spent summers in Charleston, it’s where I first lived on my own after graduating college. It’s an area of rich histories and deep dichotomies, and on that day, I was furious that a man chose that city and that church for his last stand to try to incite a race war.

I grew up in Arkansas, around the corner from both a confederate cemetery and Headquarters House, a Civil War era home that served as headquarters for both the Union and confederate forces at one point or another. I went to their Civil War Days, learned the history, and saw the mini ball hole in the doors. Despite all the theatrics, it was always clear that the confederacy lost. Even in the architecture around town: legend has it that the architect for the main building on the University of Arkansas campus built the northern tower a little taller and more graceful as a permanent reminder.

I know my heritage, and I know it is often filled with hate. I have no misconceptions about my privilege as a white woman, and a white woman in the south. You don’t even have to try hard to prove that I benefited from slavery and the huge sins of the south. The so-called Queen of the Confederacy, Lucy Holcombe Pickens, is a not-very-distant cousin. I’m working on it, but I’ve still got a ways to go.

What makes me angry is the people who haven’t worked on it, who pick up symbols and banners and colors from the past, loudly proclaim these to be something they’re not, and use them as a rallying point. The confederate flag is a myth; there was never one unifying flag that flew over the confederacy (states’ rights and all that, right? Wasn’t that the point?). Monuments to the confederacy, as has been widely circulated this week, were largely put in place well after Reconstruction.

I’ve never been good about tempering my opinions. It was a common note on many report cards that I was loud and opinionated and had no qualms about speaking up. One particular teacher had a meeting with my parents about it because he felt like I, a 10 year old, was undermining him in class. During the conference, my parents compromised: they’d work with me on when it was appropriate to bring things up, but wouldn’t stifle my voice. I have a vivid memory of my mother telling me, “It’s taken too long for some women to find their voices. I’m not going to tell my daughter to lose hers.”

So I’ve been angry this week. I’ve been reading and watching and seething. Of everything I’ve read, I keep coming back to one piece from The Bitter Southerner this week.

But we cannot ignore the fact that these people — wherever they are from — chose our region and the symbols of the Confederacy as the place to take their stand. Therefore, it’s up to us to root them out. As for me, I find myself inextricably drawn to a simple idea: that the time for the benevolent but silent white Southerner is over.

I’m going to keep being angry. And I’m going to keep being loud about it. The time for silence was far too long ago.